January 22 2026
(notes from NotebookLM)
Guest Context: Sarah B. Rogers
- Role: Rogers serves as the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy. While traditional diplomacy involves government-to-government relationships, her role focuses on the relationship between the U.S. government and foreign publics.
- Modern Focus: Her portfolio has evolved with the internet to address the "information ecosystem," dealing with "disinformation," and managing the tension between American free speech values and foreign regulations.
The Conflict: U.S. Free Speech vs. European Regulation
Rogers and the hosts discuss a widening divide between the U.S. (focused on the First Amendment and individual conscience) and Europe (focused on "technocratic regulation" and safety).
1. The United Kingdom: The Online Safety Act (OSA)
- Scope: The OSA imposes age-gating and requires platforms to assess risks for "upsetting" content, even if it is legal in the U.S..
- Enforcement: In 2023 alone, over 12,000 people were arrested for speech acts in the UK—more than in Russia, China, or Turkey.
- Specific Examples of Arrests/Prosecution:
◦ Graeme Linehan: A comedian arrested and detained for gender-critical tweets (suggesting a woman should challenge a biological male in a women's restroom).
◦ Joey Barton: A footballer given a suspended prison sentence for insulting someone online (calling them a "bike nonce").
◦ Lucy Connolly: A mother sentenced to 31 months in prison for an inflammatory anti-migration tweet following the stabbing of three girls. Rogers noted this speech would be "unambiguously legal" in the U.S..
- Two-Tier Policing: There is a perception in the UK that those criticizing mass migration face harsher legal penalties than those committing other crimes, such as possessing child pornography.
2. The European Union: The Digital Services Act (DSA)
- Vague Standards: The DSA mandates hate speech prohibitions that are much vaguer than American laws, creating a "chilling effect" on large, risk-averse corporations.
- Targeting U.S. Companies:
◦ Fines as Tariffs: High fines (such as a potential €140 million fine against X/Twitter) are viewed by Rogers and the hosts as a "censorship tariff" or a "de facto tax" on American tech success.
◦ Extraterritorial Threats: An EU official threatened Elon Musk with enforcement action simply for hosting an interview with Donald Trump on X, despite the interview taking place in the U.S. Rogers characterized this as a threat to American interests and values.
- Jurisdiction: Rogers argues that while Europe can regulate its own territory, it should not impose its censorship standards on American platforms operating on American soil.
The "Censorship Industrial Complex"
The conversation highlights how censorship mechanisms have shifted from direct government action to indirect pressure through non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and corporations.
- Government Proxies: Rogers explains that governments use "dark NGOs" (often government-funded) to bypass First Amendment restrictions. These groups act as "trusted flaggers" to report content to social media platforms.
- Specific Evidence: Leaked emails from the "Center for Countering Digital Hate" (a British NGO) revealed a priority to "kill Musk's Twitter" and instigate EU regulatory action against American companies.
- Debanking and Corporate Pressure:
◦ The Tactic: Activists and regulators pressure risk-averse middlemen (banks, PayPal, Cloudflare) to drop disfavored speakers under the guise of "reputational risk".
◦ Legal Pushback: Rogers cited her Supreme Court victory in NRA v. Vullo, which ruled that government entities cannot coerce financial institutions to blacklist clients based on their political viewpoints.
U.S. Domestic Issues & COVID-19
- Biden Administration: The hosts and Rogers discussed how the Biden administration pressured tech companies to suppress narratives labeled as "disinformation," many of which turned out to be true or debatable (e.g., the lab leak theory and vaccine transmission rates).
- "Disinformation" vs. "Malinformation": Rogers noted that the definition of disinformation was stretched to include "malinformation"—information that is factually true but promotes a narrative the government dislikes.
Technology: AI and Verification
- Regulating AI: Rogers warns against creating a "flurry of new regulations" for AI and deepfakes. She argues that existing laws regarding defamation and fraud are sufficient to handle misuse of new technology.
- Community Notes: The "Community Notes" feature on X is praised as a superior alternative to bureaucratic fact-checking. It works by requiring consensus from users with opposing viewpoints before a note is published, making it difficult to weaponize.
Future Outlook
- Diplomatic Strategy: The U.S. is using visa denials, trade tools, and sanctions to push back against foreign censorship of American speech. For example, the leader of a censorship-focused NGO was targeted with visa sanctions.
- Optimism: Rogers believes that despite government overreach, the average European citizen values free speech. She argues that extreme measures, like a "Great Firewall" blocking American social media in the UK, would be politically impossible for leaders like Keir Starmer to implement because the public would not accept it.
Comments